Stock Comparison
CF vs NVDA — Which is the Better Buy in 2026?
Side-by-side analysis of fundamentals, valuation, profitability, and quant factors. Data-driven decision, not investment advice.
vs
Data-Driven Verdict
NVDA appears stronger on the data
NVDA edges out CF, winning 7 of 13 fundamental and quant metrics.
CF wins5/13
NVDA wins7/13
Tied / N/A1/13
This verdict reflects a deterministic comparison of fundamental and quant factor data, not investment advice. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Gold cells highlight the stronger metric. 13 metrics scored.
| Metric | CF | NVDA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
P/E RatioLower is better | 10.12x | 32.38x | CF |
P/B RatioLower is better | 3.23x | 32.62x | CF |
ROEHigher is better | 27.30% | 114.29% | NVDA |
Operating MarginHigher is better | 33.59% | 65.60% | NVDA |
Revenue GrowthHigher is better | 19.40% | 85.20% | NVDA |
Debt RatioLower is better | 43.85% | 6.55% | NVDA |
Dividend YieldHigher is better | 1.78% | 0.47% | CF |
Market Cap | $17.26B | $5.11T | Tie |
Quality FactorHigher is better | 0.927 | 0.989 | NVDA |
Value FactorHigher is better | 0.739 | 0.305 | CF |
Momentum FactorHigher is better | 0.400 | 0.600 | NVDA |
Growth FactorHigher is better | 0.912 | 1.00 | NVDA |
Composite ScoreHigher is better | 0.763 | 0.708 | CF |
Quant Factor Breakdown
Composite scoring across Quality, Value, Momentum, and Growth (0.0–1.0 scale).
Quality FactorNVDA leads
CF
0.927NVDA
0.989
Value FactorCF leads
CF
0.739NVDA
0.305
Momentum FactorNVDA leads
CF
0.400NVDA
0.600
Growth FactorNVDA leads
CF
0.912NVDA
1.00
Composite ScoreCF leads
CF
0.763NVDA
0.708